Mrs. Lovett’s Meat Pies And Why Customer Satisfaction Doesn’t Override Health Laws
In the musical Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street, Mrs. Lovett’s pie shop is struggling until she starts baking Sweeney Todd’s murder victims into her meat pies. Customers eagerly line up outside the shop to purchase Ms. Lovett’s special meat pies. Everyone is happy – Mrs. Lovett’s shop is finally making money, Sweeney Todd is able to exact revenge for the wrongs done to him, and customers are enjoying the best pies they have ever eaten. However, the business model is, to put it mildly, not one a health department would approve.
Food-safety rules don’t depend on customer enthusiasm. Mrs. Lovett’s customers didn’t complain because they didn’t know what they were eating. But their silence didn’t make the pie ingredients lawful, sanitary, or acceptable.
I thought about this recently while enjoying my morning java at a small, local coffee shop. A customer brought in a beautiful golden retriever. The dog was striking, elegant, and calm, and behaved beautifully.
Then, the customer encouraged the dog to climb onto the fabric booth to sit next to her. It was at that point that the issue with the dog became impossible to ignore. This wasn’t a quick trip inside to pick up a coffee while walking the dog. It wasn’t a service animal accompanying a person with a disability. It was a pet sitting on upholstered furniture in a food-service establishment.
No one appeared to object. The dog was lovely. The barista either didn’t notice or didn’t want to offend a paying customer. In short, the shop seemed to keep operating as usual.
But, as Sweeney Todd points out in an extreme way, the absence of a customer complaint doesn’t mean that something is considerate or legal. Health codes aren’t like etiquette rules designed to keep society cordial -- they are public-health rules that apply even when everyone in the establishment would rather look the other way. This article discusses laws relating to service animals, emotional support animals, and pets in Maryland food service establishments.
Service Animal, Emotional Support Animal, or Pet?
Maryland law treats animals differently depending on whether they are service animals, emotional support animals, or pets. This distinction is also important when evaluating compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and other laws that require accommodations for individuals with disabilities.
ADA defines "service animal" narrowly. Only dogs (and, under some circumstances, miniature horses) can be service animals. Further, under the ADA, service animals must be trained to work or perform tasks for a disabled individual.
For instance, seeing eye dogs and dogs that assist deaf individuals by alerting them to audible fire alarms. A service animal may be trained to perform other tasks, such as anticipating an impending seizure for an epileptic, detecting dangerously low blood sugar for a person with diabetes, or carrying items for an individual whose physical disability prevents them from doing so.
"Emotional support animals" may be dogs, but they also can be other animals. Cats are common emotional support animals, and news reports have reported on a pig, a chicken, a peacock, and a squirrel serving as emotional support animals. Emotional support animals also assist disabled individuals and can be invaluable in improving the lives of neurodivergent individuals or those with mental health concerns. However, while service animals have specific training to perform specific tasks, emotional support animals have no specific training.
Lastly, pets are animals people keep for companionship rather than to assist with a disability. Like emotional support animals, pets may be dogs, but they can also be other animals. Pets may improve the lives of their humans, whether or not they are neurodivergent or have mental health concerns.
Since many disabilities aren’t readily visible, it can be challenging to differentiate an emotional support animal from a pet at first sight. The situation is further confused because some people try to obtain special treatment by falsely claiming their pets are emotional support animals. Unfortunately, such fraudulent claims can cause actual harm to individuals who rely on emotional support animals because they can cause businesses to treat all claims that an animal is an emotional support animal with suspicion.
Maryland Law Regarding Animals in Food Service Facilities
Even though both service animals and emotional support animals help disabled individuals, the ADA and Maryland law treat them differently. The ADA requires that service animals be allowed in areas of public accommodation. That means that businesses open to the public, including restaurants, coffee shops, and grocery stores, must allow service animals into any area where members of the public generally are allowed.
Under the ADA, service animals may be excluded from an area of public accommodation only under the following circumstances:
The handler cannot or does not control the service animal.
The service animal is not housebroken.
The service animal poses a direct threat to the health or safety of others that cannot be reduced or eliminated acceptably through a reasonable modification of practices or procedures. Whether a service animal is a direct threat must be based on the specific animal, not on speculation or upon experience with other animals.
The ADA doesn't cover emotional support animals, so individuals have no right under the ADA to have their emotional support animal in a public accommodation. Other laws, such as the Fair Housing Act, employment discrimination laws, and state or local laws, may provide individuals with the right to have their emotional support animal in their home or workplace. However, those laws usually won't apply to customers at food service businesses.
Maryland and DC Laws
Most state and local retail food regulations prohibit all animals in food service establishments. The ADA and similar state laws typically provide an exception for service animals as long as they do not provide a direct threat to the health or safety of others. However, that exception does not apply to emotional support animals or pets.
Maryland's retail food regulations allow service animals in food service facilities, including restaurants and grocery stores. Under Maryland law, service animals may accompany their humans in public buildings, restaurants, shops, hospitals, schools, and hotels, even though they may be food service establishments.
Maryland law doesn’t allow emotional support animals or pets at indoor food service establishments. Maryland law may, however, allow emotional support animals at outdoor dining areas provided a business establishment meets certain conditions, including signage and prior Health Department approval. Maryland law also allows pet dogs (but not other pets) to accompany their humans in outdoor dining areas under some circumstances and conditions.
For example, if a restaurant offers both indoor and outdoor seating, a person with a service dog cannot be required to dine outside due to the presence of the animal. However, the same is not true for emotional support animals.
District of Columbia’s (DC) Dining with Dogs Act of 2018 allows food establishments to permit dogs in outdoor dining areas or unenclosed sidewalk cafés with conditions:
Post signage outside the food establishment clearly stating that dogs are permitted in outdoor dining areas of the food establishment or in an unenclosed sidewalk café adjacent to the food establishment, along with any restrictions on dogs based on size or temperament.
Provide an entrance to the outdoor dining area that does not require dogs to enter an indoor dining area or an area in which food is being stored or prepared.
Provide patrons with waste bags and a sanitary means of disposing of waste bags.
Ensure that food employees do not care for or handle dogs.
Require a patron to keep the patron's dog in a carrier or on a leash at all times.
Prohibit a patron from leaving their dog unattended.
Under both Maryland and DC law, a food service establishment isn’t permitted to allow emotional support animals indoors and can require an individual with an emotional support dog to dine outdoors. It’s important to note that in both Maryland and DC, individuals with emotional support animals other than dogs are out of luck, as the laws permitting animals at outdoor dining facilities is limited to dogs.
Customer Consensus Doesn’t Matter to Health Regulators
This prohibition of emotional support animals and pets at indoor dining venues isn’t at the discretion of the restaurant, coffee shop, or other food service establishment. Businesses aren’t legally permitted to make an exception for a well-behaved dog or a small dog in a “pet purse.” Even if every customer in the restaurant consents to the animal’s presence, health laws require that the animals be excluded.
The customer who takes their dog into the restaurant may suffer no legal consequences. However, a business that allows emotional support animals or pets in its establishment can be cited for violating food regulations. The business likely will have to pay a fine and, in an extreme case, could be shut down. Further, since restaurant rating websites and apps frequently report the business’ “health score,” that can affect the business, especially when it’s a small, locally-owned coffee shop.
I love animals. And like the human with the golden retriever in the coffee shop, I consider my pets to be family members. The customer who brought their golden retriever into the coffee shop clearly was bonded with the dog and loved it. But because I also appreciate how hard it is for a small business to achieve success, especially in the low profit margin coffee shop business, it upset me to see the dog in the coffee shop because I understood the awkward situation the customer put the business’ owner and baristas in.
The business is in a true “Catch-22.” If they don’t exclude the pet or emotional support animal, they can suffer from fines and a poor health score. But if they insist that customers comply with the health laws, the business may experience negative social media ratings or posts claiming they aren’t “dog-friendly” or are insensitive to the need for an emotional support animal.
Best Practices for Food Service Businesses
Business owners must balance the need to comply with food safety laws with customer relations issues. As such, businesses should focus on customer communication, education, and legal compliance.
Customers may not mean harm when they take their dogs into a coffee shop briefly to pick up their morning java while walking their dogs. They may think it's just for a few minutes, and they aren't staying. They are focused on their own needs rather than on the fact that the business could suffer if the food inspector shows up during those minutes.
Individuals with emotional support animals who wrongly believe that under the ADA, they may take their animals into public accommodations, including food service businesses. A business that excludes emotional support animals may face claims they violated the ADA. Even if the claims are dismissed (as they should be), the claim takes both time and money to defend.
Through customer education, businesses can increase compliance with food safety laws. We see "no shoes, no shirt, no service" signs on the doors of food service businesses. Businesses should also post signs saying, "We love animals, but due to legal requirements, your animals must remain outside."
Signage that says only service animals allowed could be modified to add, "We welcome individuals with disabilities, but due to legal requirements, we cannot welcome emotional support animals." Signage like this may also empower and support employees who are expected to enforce food safety laws.
In other words, even dog-friendly rules remain rules. They may permit dogs on patios. They may allow restaurants to create outdoor dog-friendly areas. But being dog-friendly doesn’t turn an indoor coffee shop booth into a private sofa. The coffee shop is a regulated food-service business. Unfortunately, when a customer treats the shop like their private space, the business, not the customer, may be the one left to answer to the health department.
Conclusion
A beautiful dog in a coffee shop is a far cry frrom Mrs. Lovett’s mystery meat. But the musical still provides a valuable lesson. A food-service establishment can make the best meat pies in the city and be popular with customers but still violate health rules. A dog may be cleaner, quieter, and better behaved than some of the people in a restaurant, but still not be allowed inside.
Mrs. Lovett’s customers didn’t complain because they didn’t know what was happening. The customers in the coffee shop may not have complained because they didn’t mind or didn’t notice. Or, like me, they might have been upset by the dog’s human companion’s apparent disregard of the impact the dog’s presence could have on the hard-working small business owner’s livelihood or on a customer with a severe dog allergy – but not want to disturb the peaceful environment or even risk a violent reaction by making a scene.
Health codes are designed to prevent these uncomfortable situations. They set the rules before the meat pie is prepared and served and before the dog walks into the coffee shop. People with dogs should become familiar with those laws, recognize that they aren’t meant to devalue their relationships with their animals, and understand that silence shouldn’t be mistaken for permission.
© 2026 by Elizabeth A. Whitman
Any references to clients and their legal situations or specific individuals may have been modified to protect client confidentiality.
DISCLAIMER: The content of this blog is for informational purposes only and does not provide legal advice. No one should take any action regarding the information in this blog without first seeking the advice of an attorney. Neither reading this blog nor communication with Whitman Legal Solutions, LLC or Elizabeth A. Whitman creates an attorney-client relationship. No attorney-client relationship will exist with Whitman Legal Solutions, LLC, or any attorney affiliated with it unless a written contract is signed by all parties.